Perhaps this site should focus on some of the other players on the tour rather than just East Europeans. I know this site is focused on Daniela, but I don't see why discussion on players from outside of Eastern Europe can't take place. Having a thread to discuss Serena Williams, an eight-time grand slam champion, and potentially world number 1 by the end of the year, I don't find that much of a waste of space (as you so aptly put it).
Of course I am not the site manager, Christina is, no? So I will post any relavent information in WTA Tour thread.

I don't want be a nitpicker here, but do we really need all these threads on players most of us aren't even fans of?
Then I click to see new messages and there are plenty of threads and posts I am not even remotely interested in (like this one for example) and it can be rather difficult to orientate in it. Waste of space imo. If Scott and others want to keep track on Murray and British players that's fine with me - they are big fans of them, but threads about Williams, Golovin or Nalbandian (despite me being a big fan) are a bit too much.
We had a similar problem on matt's forum in the Slovak section - too many pointless threads and their content was mostly results, schedule etc and nobody else than mods posted in it. Had to clean it drastically. I think this the reason why there are WTA and ATP season threads, there it is where you should discuss other players.
That's my 5 cents here.

Preach on, Brother Martin, I couldn't agree more. There are so many "who the hell cares" and passport threads. I'm pretty sure there are forums where you can talk about whoever you want to talk with people who really care rather than just churn out spam here.

Talking about passport threads, it's just as well there aren't any Spanish or Russian posters otherwise we'd be inundated.

Let me clarify this then, I will go straight to the point. Note that I don‘t want to offend anyone, but it will be the best way how to express my feelings.
Gasquet and Radwanska threads – 30% discussion, 10% pics, 60% orders of play + results + draws (aka info you can find elsewhere if you really wanna know it, 60% of posts therefore pointless, some might argue that pics are pointless too).
As for the British players threads, I tried to be diplomatic in this case. I respect what Scott has done on matt‘s board and here as a long time member and moderator, and that he helps with this forum and invests a lot of free time in it, which is great (you do it too, but you are still a newbie here ). Therefore I think I can „tolerate“ those threads, although to be honest I am not very fond of them.
Kirilenko and Vaidisova, well I support Vaidisova just as any Czech player, but any discussion about her would fit into the WTA season thread. I don‘t get why we need these special threads on every player. I would like them better if there was actually some discussion in them. But most of the posts are again OOP, draws and results – such posts are for naught in the long term. They have some questionable value for 1 or maybe 2 days, after that nothing. Discussion is much more interesting, because you can read it next year for example and it will still give you some interesting information. That is something order of play won‘t ever do.

Olympic thread is something absolutely different btw.

Conclusion you should draw from this is that I am mainly against pointless posts in these threads – draws, results, order of play etc. If you had kept some decent discussion in there instead, then I am quite sure I wouldn‘t have been bitching here. Maybe I would have even made some comments on the mentioned players. However, I still prefer one thread on the whole WTA and another one on the whole ATP.

I watched some of her first round match. Her returns were awesome. Even though the Govortsova's serve wasn't the worst Serena could take it soon and return a winner. And she could hit anywhere in the court she felt like it. I must admit I admire players who create winners out of nowhere.